Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Sao10k

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 vs Llama 3 8B Lunaris

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Track Your LLM Costs Across Every Provider Broken down by user, feature, and endpoint

107 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports tool calls

Llama 3 8B Lunaris wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Llama 3 8B Lunaris
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Context Window
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Speed
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Llama 3 8B LunarisWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.07$0.04 Llama 3 8B Lunaris
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.10$0.05 Llama 3 8B Lunaris
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.04N/A Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Llama 3 8B Lunaris is 46% cheaper overall.

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 Providers

No provider data available

Llama 3 8B Lunaris Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
2
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 Wins
1
Llama 3 8B Lunaris Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Llama 3 8B LunarisWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
25.025.6
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
22.1--
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
71.7--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
82.831.0
GPQA
Graduate-level science
75.36.8
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
52.4--
AIME
Competition math
71.7--
BBH
Big-Bench Hard
-32.1-
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
262,144
tokens
Llama 3 8B Lunaris
8,192
tokens
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 has a 97% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Llama 3 8B LunarisWinner
Tokens/second63.4 tok/sN/A
Time to First Token1.06sN/A

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Llama 3 8B Lunaris
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Llama 3 8B Lunaris
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorQwenSao10k
ReleasedJul 2025Aug 2024

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Llama 3 8B Lunaris Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 with:

Compare Llama 3 8B Lunaris with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3 8B Lunaris has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. Llama 3 8B Lunaris has cheaper output pricing at $0.05/M tokens.
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 22.1, compared to Llama 3 8B Lunaris's score of N/A.
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 has a 262,144 token context window, while Llama 3 8B Lunaris has a 8,192 token context window.
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 does not support vision. Llama 3 8B Lunaris does not support vision.