Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Xiaomi

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 vs MiMo-V2-Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

108 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at math

MiMo-V2-Flash wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo-V2-Flash
Context Window
MiMo-V2-Flash
Speed
MiMo-V2-Flash

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507MiMo-V2-FlashWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.07$0.09 Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.10$0.29 Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.04$0.01 MiMo-V2-Flash
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 is 44% cheaper overall.

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 Providers

No provider data available

MiMo-V2-Flash Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

7
Benchmarks Compared
4
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 Wins
2
MiMo-V2-Flash Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507MiMo-V2-FlashWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
25.030.4
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
22.125.8
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
71.767.7
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
82.874.4
GPQA
Graduate-level science
75.365.6
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
52.440.2
AIME
Competition math
71.7--
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 wins 4 out of 7 benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
262,144
tokens
MiMo-V2-Flash
262,144
tokens

Speed Performance

MetricQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507MiMo-V2-FlashWinner
Tokens/second65.8 tok/s134.8 tok/s
Time to First Token1.08s1.72s
MiMo-V2-Flash responds 105% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507MiMo-V2-Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507MiMo-V2-Flash
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorQwenXiaomi
ReleasedJul 2025Dec 2025

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiMo-V2-Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 with:

Compare MiMo-V2-Flash with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 has cheaper input pricing at $0.07/M tokens. Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 25.8, compared to Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507's score of 22.1.
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 has a 262,144 token context window, while MiMo-V2-Flash has a 262,144 token context window.
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 does not support vision. MiMo-V2-Flash does not support vision.