Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Z-ai

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 vs GLM 4.5 Air

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark

GLM 4.5 Air wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Benchmark Advantage
GLM 4.5 Air
Context Window
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Speed
GLM 4.5 Air

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507GLM 4.5 Air
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507GLM 4.5 Air
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorQwenZ-ai
ReleasedJul 2025Jul 2025

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GLM 4.5 Air Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 has cheaper input pricing at $0.07/M tokens. Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
GLM 4.5 Air scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 23.8, compared to Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507's score of 22.1.
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 has a 262,144 token context window, while GLM 4.5 Air has a 131,072 token context window.
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 does not support vision. GLM 4.5 Air does not support vision.