Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Xiaomi

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs MiMo-V2-Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins:

  • No clear advantages in compared metrics

MiMo-V2-Flash wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
MiMo-V2-Flash
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo-V2-Flash
Context Window
MiMo-V2-Flash
Speed
MiMo-V2-Flash

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507MiMo-V2-Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507MiMo-V2-Flash
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorQwenXiaomi
ReleasedJul 2025Dec 2025

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiMo-V2-Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

MiMo-V2-Flash has cheaper input pricing at $0.09/M tokens. MiMo-V2-Flash has cheaper output pricing at $0.29/M tokens.
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 has a 262,144 token context window, while MiMo-V2-Flash has a 262,144 token context window.
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 does not support vision. MiMo-V2-Flash does not support vision.