Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Qwen3 235B A22B vs Qwen3.5-27B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Qwen3 235B A22B wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen3.5-27B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Qwen3 235B A22B
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5-27B
Context Window
Qwen3.5-27B
Speed
Qwen3.5-27B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3 235B A22BQwen3.5-27B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3 235B A22BQwen3.5-27B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorQwenQwen
ReleasedApr 2025Feb 2026

Qwen3 235B A22B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3.5-27B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Qwen3 235B A22B with:

Compare Qwen3.5-27B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3.5-27B has cheaper input pricing at $0.20/M tokens. Qwen3 235B A22B has cheaper output pricing at $0.80/M tokens.
Qwen3.5-27B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 33.4, compared to Qwen3 235B A22B's score of 14.0.
Qwen3 235B A22B has a 131,072 token context window, while Qwen3.5-27B has a 262,144 token context window.
Qwen3 235B A22B does not support vision. Qwen3.5-27B supports vision.