Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Xiaomi

Qwen3 235B A22B vs MiMo v2 Omni

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Qwen3 235B A22B wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

MiMo v2 Omni wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Qwen3 235B A22B
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Omni
Context Window
MiMo v2 Omni
Speed
Qwen3 235B A22B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3 235B A22BMiMo v2 Omni
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3 235B A22BMiMo v2 Omni
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorQwenXiaomi
ReleasedApr 2025Mar 2026

Qwen3 235B A22B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiMo v2 Omni Modalities

Input
textaudioimagevideo
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Qwen3 235B A22B with:

Compare MiMo v2 Omni with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 235B A22B has cheaper input pricing at $0.40/M tokens. Qwen3 235B A22B has cheaper output pricing at $0.80/M tokens.
MiMo v2 Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 35.5, compared to Qwen3 235B A22B's score of 14.0.
Qwen3 235B A22B has a 131,072 token context window, while MiMo v2 Omni has a 262,144 token context window.
Qwen3 235B A22B does not support vision. MiMo v2 Omni supports vision.