Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Qwen3 Max Thinking

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time

Qwen3 Max Thinking wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3 Max Thinking
Context Window
Qwen3 Max Thinking
Speed
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Qwen3 Max Thinking
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Qwen3 Max Thinking
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorQwenQwen
ReleasedJul 2025Feb 2026

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3 Max Thinking Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 has cheaper input pricing at $0.09/M tokens. Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 has cheaper output pricing at $0.30/M tokens.
Qwen3 Max Thinking scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 24.5, compared to Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507's score of 14.2.
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 has a 262,144 token context window, while Qwen3 Max Thinking has a 262,144 token context window.
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 does not support vision. Qwen3 Max Thinking does not support vision.