Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Xiaomi

Qwen3 30B A3B vs MiMo-V2-Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Qwen3 30B A3B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Supports tool calls

MiMo-V2-Flash wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Qwen3 30B A3B
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo-V2-Flash
Context Window
MiMo-V2-Flash
Speed
MiMo-V2-Flash

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricQwen3 30B A3BMiMo-V2-FlashWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.06$0.09 Qwen3 30B A3B
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.22$0.29 Qwen3 30B A3B
Cache Read (per 1M)$30000.00$45000.00 Qwen3 30B A3B
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen3 30B A3B is 29% cheaper overall.

Qwen3 30B A3B Providers

Chutes $0.06 (Cheapest)
DeepInfra $0.08
Novita $0.09
Alibaba $0.13
NextBit $0.14

MiMo-V2-Flash Providers

Chutes $0.09 (Cheapest)
AtlasCloud $0.10
Xiaomi $0.10
Novita $0.10

Benchmark Comparison

7
Benchmarks Compared
0
Qwen3 30B A3B Wins
6
MiMo-V2-Flash Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3BMiMo-V2-FlashWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
12.430.6
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
13.325.8
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
21.767.7
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
71.074.4
GPQA
Graduate-level science
51.565.6
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
32.240.2
AIME
Competition math
26.0--
MiMo-V2-Flash significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Qwen3 30B A3B
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Qwen3 30B A3B
40,960
tokens
Max output: 40,960 tokens
MiMo-V2-Flash
262,144
tokens
MiMo-V2-Flash has a 84% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricQwen3 30B A3BMiMo-V2-FlashWinner
Tokens/second70.5 tok/s142.6 tok/s
Time to First Token1.06s1.25s
MiMo-V2-Flash responds 102% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3 30B A3BMiMo-V2-Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3 30B A3BMiMo-V2-Flash
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorQwenXiaomi
ReleasedApr 2025Dec 2025

Qwen3 30B A3B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiMo-V2-Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Qwen3 30B A3B with:

Compare MiMo-V2-Flash with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 30B A3B has cheaper input pricing at $0.06/M tokens. Qwen3 30B A3B has cheaper output pricing at $0.22/M tokens.
MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 25.8, compared to Qwen3 30B A3B's score of 13.3.
Qwen3 30B A3B has a 40,960 token context window, while MiMo-V2-Flash has a 262,144 token context window.
Qwen3 30B A3B does not support vision. MiMo-V2-Flash does not support vision.