Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Xiaomi

Qwen3 32B vs MiMo-V2-Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Qwen3 32B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Supports tool calls

MiMo-V2-Flash wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Qwen3 32B
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo-V2-Flash
Context Window
MiMo-V2-Flash
Speed
MiMo-V2-Flash

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricQwen3 32BMiMo-V2-FlashWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.08$0.09 Qwen3 32B
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.24$0.29 Qwen3 32B
Cache Read (per 1M)$40000.00$45000.00 Qwen3 32B
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen3 32B is 14% cheaper overall.

Qwen3 32B Providers

Chutes $0.08 (Cheapest)
DeepInfra $0.08 (Cheapest)
AtlasCloud $0.10
Novita $0.10
Alibaba $0.10

MiMo-V2-Flash Providers

Chutes $0.09 (Cheapest)
AtlasCloud $0.10
Xiaomi $0.10
Novita $0.10

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
0
Qwen3 32B Wins
5
MiMo-V2-Flash Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkQwen3 32BMiMo-V2-FlashWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
14.530.6
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-25.8-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
19.767.7
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
72.774.4
GPQA
Graduate-level science
53.565.6
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
28.840.2
Aider
Real-world code editing
40.0--
AIME
Competition math
30.3--
MiMo-V2-Flash significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Qwen3 32B
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Qwen3 32B
40,960
tokens
Max output: 40,960 tokens
MiMo-V2-Flash
262,144
tokens
MiMo-V2-Flash has a 84% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricQwen3 32BMiMo-V2-FlashWinner
Tokens/second86.1 tok/s142.6 tok/s
Time to First Token1.05s1.25s
MiMo-V2-Flash responds 66% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3 32BMiMo-V2-Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3 32BMiMo-V2-Flash
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorQwenXiaomi
ReleasedApr 2025Dec 2025

Qwen3 32B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiMo-V2-Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Qwen3 32B with:

Compare MiMo-V2-Flash with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 32B has cheaper input pricing at $0.08/M tokens. Qwen3 32B has cheaper output pricing at $0.24/M tokens.
MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 25.8, compared to Qwen3 32B's score of N/A.
Qwen3 32B has a 40,960 token context window, while MiMo-V2-Flash has a 262,144 token context window.
Qwen3 32B does not support vision. MiMo-V2-Flash does not support vision.