Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507 vs Qwen3.5-27B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507 wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens

Qwen3.5-27B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5-27B
Context Window
Qwen3.5-27B
Speed
Qwen3.5-27B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3 4B Instruct 2507Qwen3.5-27B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3 4B Instruct 2507Qwen3.5-27B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorQwenQwen
ReleasedUnknownFeb 2026

Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507 Modalities

Input
Output

Qwen3.5-27B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3.5-27B has cheaper input pricing at $0.20/M tokens. Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507 has cheaper output pricing at $0.20/M tokens.
Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507 has a 262,144 token context window, while Qwen3.5-27B has a 262,144 token context window.
Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507 does not support vision. Qwen3.5-27B supports vision.