Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct vs Qwen3 Max Thinking

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

Qwen3 Max Thinking wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3 Max Thinking
Context Window
Qwen3 Max Thinking
Speed
Qwen3 Max Thinking

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructQwen3 Max Thinking
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructQwen3 Max Thinking
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorQwenQwen
ReleasedJul 2025Feb 2026

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3 Max Thinking Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.07/M tokens. Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.27/M tokens.
Qwen3 Max Thinking scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 24.5, compared to Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct's score of 19.4.
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct has a 160,000 token context window, while Qwen3 Max Thinking has a 262,144 token context window.
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct does not support vision. Qwen3 Max Thinking does not support vision.