Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Xiaomi

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct vs MiMo-V2-Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

100 out of our 304 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Supports tool calls

MiMo-V2-Flash wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo-V2-Flash
Context Window
MiMo-V2-Flash
Speed
MiMo-V2-Flash

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructMiMo-V2-FlashWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.07$0.09 Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.27$0.29 Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct is 14% cheaper overall.

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct Providers

SiliconFlow $0.07 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.07 (Cheapest)
Nebius $0.10
Amazon Bedrock $0.15
Alibaba $0.75

MiMo-V2-Flash Providers

Chutes $0.09 (Cheapest)
AtlasCloud $0.10
Xiaomi $0.10
Novita $0.10

Benchmark Comparison

7
Benchmarks Compared
0
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct Wins
5
MiMo-V2-Flash Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructMiMo-V2-FlashWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
20.030.6
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
19.425.8
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
29.067.7
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
70.674.4
GPQA
Graduate-level science
51.665.6
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
40.340.2-
AIME
Competition math
29.7--
MiMo-V2-Flash significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
160,000
tokens
Max output: 32,768 tokens
MiMo-V2-Flash
262,144
tokens
MiMo-V2-Flash has a 39% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructMiMo-V2-FlashWinner
Tokens/second104.3 tok/s145.1 tok/s
Time to First Token1.53s1.22s
MiMo-V2-Flash responds 39% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructMiMo-V2-Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructMiMo-V2-Flash
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorQwenXiaomi
ReleasedJul 2025Dec 2025

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiMo-V2-Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct with:

Compare MiMo-V2-Flash with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.07/M tokens. Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.27/M tokens.
MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 25.8, compared to Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct's score of 19.4.
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct has a 160,000 token context window, while MiMo-V2-Flash has a 262,144 token context window.
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct does not support vision. MiMo-V2-Flash does not support vision.