Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Z-ai

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct vs GLM-4.7-Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

GLM-4.7-Flash wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
Context Window
GLM-4.7-Flash
Speed
GLM-4.7-Flash

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructGLM-4.7-Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructGLM-4.7-Flash
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorQwenZ-ai
ReleasedJul 2025Jan 2026

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GLM-4.7-Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

GLM-4.7-Flash has cheaper input pricing at $0.06/M tokens. Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.27/M tokens.
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 19.4, compared to GLM-4.7-Flash's score of 11.0.
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct has a 160,000 token context window, while GLM-4.7-Flash has a 202,752 token context window.
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct does not support vision. GLM-4.7-Flash supports vision.