Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Qwen3 Coder Flash vs Qwen3.5-27B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

115 out of our 496 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

New

Stop Googling APIs — let your agent choose

Our upcoming API Finder MCP server helps AI agents discover and compare APIs for any task.

Key Takeaways

Qwen3 Coder Flash wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen3.5-27B wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Qwen3 Coder Flash
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5-27B
Context Window
Qwen3 Coder Flash
Speed
Qwen3.5-27B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3 Coder FlashQwen3.5-27B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3 Coder FlashQwen3.5-27B
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorQwenQwen
ReleasedSep 2025Feb 2026

Qwen3 Coder Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3.5-27B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Qwen3 Coder Flash with:

Compare Qwen3.5-27B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 Coder Flash has cheaper input pricing at $0.20/M tokens. Qwen3 Coder Flash has cheaper output pricing at $0.97/M tokens.
Qwen3.5-27B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 33.4, compared to Qwen3 Coder Flash's score of N/A.
Qwen3 Coder Flash has a 1,000,000 token context window, while Qwen3.5-27B has a 262,144 token context window.
Qwen3 Coder Flash does not support vision. Qwen3.5-27B supports vision.