Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Qwen3 Coder Flash vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Qwen3 Coder Flash wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen3.5 397B A17B wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Qwen3 Coder Flash
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Context Window
Qwen3 Coder Flash
Speed
Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3 Coder FlashQwen3.5 397B A17B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3 Coder FlashQwen3.5 397B A17B
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorQwenQwen
ReleasedSep 2025Feb 2026

Qwen3 Coder Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3.5 397B A17B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 Coder Flash has cheaper input pricing at $0.20/M tokens. Qwen3.5 397B A17B has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
Qwen3 Coder Flash has a 1,000,000 token context window, while Qwen3.5 397B A17B has a 262,144 token context window.
Qwen3 Coder Flash does not support vision. Qwen3.5 397B A17B supports vision.