Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Qwen3 Coder Next vs Qwen3.5-27B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

119 out of our 496 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Qwen3 Coder Next wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time

Qwen3.5-27B wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Qwen3 Coder Next
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5-27B
Context Window
Qwen3.5-27B
Speed
Qwen3 Coder Next

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3 Coder NextQwen3.5-27B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3 Coder NextQwen3.5-27B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorQwenQwen
ReleasedFeb 2026Feb 2026

Qwen3 Coder Next Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3.5-27B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Qwen3 Coder Next with:

Compare Qwen3.5-27B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 Coder Next has cheaper input pricing at $0.12/M tokens. Qwen3 Coder Next has cheaper output pricing at $0.75/M tokens.
Qwen3.5-27B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 33.4, compared to Qwen3 Coder Next's score of 22.9.
Qwen3 Coder Next has a 262,144 token context window, while Qwen3.5-27B has a 262,144 token context window.
Qwen3 Coder Next does not support vision. Qwen3.5-27B supports vision.