Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Xiaomi

Qwen3 Coder Plus vs MiMo v2 Omni

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

115 out of our 496 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

New

Stop Googling APIs — let your agent choose

Our upcoming API Finder MCP server helps AI agents discover and compare APIs for any task.

Key Takeaways

Qwen3 Coder Plus wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Has reasoning mode

MiMo v2 Omni wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
MiMo v2 Omni
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Omni
Context Window
Qwen3 Coder Plus
Speed
MiMo v2 Omni

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3 Coder PlusMiMo v2 Omni
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3 Coder PlusMiMo v2 Omni
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorQwenXiaomi
ReleasedSep 2025Mar 2026

Qwen3 Coder Plus Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiMo v2 Omni Modalities

Input
textaudioimagevideo
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Qwen3 Coder Plus with:

Compare MiMo v2 Omni with:

Frequently Asked Questions

MiMo v2 Omni has cheaper input pricing at $0.40/M tokens. MiMo v2 Omni has cheaper output pricing at $2.00/M tokens.
MiMo v2 Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 35.5, compared to Qwen3 Coder Plus's score of N/A.
Qwen3 Coder Plus has a 1,000,000 token context window, while MiMo v2 Omni has a 262,144 token context window.
Qwen3 Coder Plus does not support vision. MiMo v2 Omni supports vision.