Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Z-ai

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) vs GLM-5 Turbo

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math

GLM-5 Turbo wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Benchmark Advantage
GLM-5 Turbo
Context Window
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Speed
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)GLM-5 Turbo
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)GLM-5 Turbo
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorQwenZ-ai
ReleasedJul 2025Mar 2026

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GLM-5 Turbo Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) has cheaper input pricing at $0.22/M tokens. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
GLM-5 Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 36.8, compared to Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)'s score of 24.6.
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) has a 262,144 token context window, while GLM-5 Turbo has a 202,752 token context window.