Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Xiaomi

Qwen3 Max Thinking vs MiMo v2 Pro

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Qwen3 Max Thinking wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls

MiMo v2 Pro wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Qwen3 Max Thinking
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Pro
Context Window
Qwen3 Max Thinking
Speed
Qwen3 Max Thinking

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3 Max ThinkingMiMo v2 Pro
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3 Max ThinkingMiMo v2 Pro
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorQwenXiaomi
ReleasedFeb 2026Unknown

Qwen3 Max Thinking Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiMo v2 Pro Modalities

Input
Output

Related Comparisons

Compare Qwen3 Max Thinking with:

Compare MiMo v2 Pro with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 Max Thinking has cheaper input pricing at $0.78/M tokens. MiMo v2 Pro has cheaper output pricing at $3.00/M tokens.
MiMo v2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.4, compared to Qwen3 Max Thinking's score of 24.5.
Qwen3 Max Thinking has a 262,144 token context window, while MiMo v2 Pro has a unknown token context window.
Qwen3 Max Thinking does not support vision. MiMo v2 Pro does not support vision.