Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct vs Qwen3.5-27B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Better at math

Qwen3.5-27B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Qwen3.5-27B
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5-27B
Context Window
Qwen3.5-27B
Speed
Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3 Omni 30B A3B InstructQwen3.5-27B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3 Omni 30B A3B InstructQwen3.5-27B
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorQwenQwen
ReleasedUnknownFeb 2026

Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct Modalities

Input
Output

Qwen3.5-27B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3.5-27B has cheaper input pricing at $0.20/M tokens. Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
Qwen3.5-27B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 33.4, compared to Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct's score of 7.2.
Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct has a 65,536 token context window, while Qwen3.5-27B has a 262,144 token context window.
Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct supports vision. Qwen3.5-27B supports vision.