Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Z-ai

Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct vs GLM-5 Turbo

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision

GLM-5 Turbo wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
GLM-5 Turbo
Context Window
GLM-5 Turbo
Speed
Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3 Omni 30B A3B InstructGLM-5 Turbo
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3 Omni 30B A3B InstructGLM-5 Turbo
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorQwenZ-ai
ReleasedUnknownMar 2026

Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct Modalities

Input
Output

GLM-5 Turbo Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.90/M tokens. Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
GLM-5 Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 36.8, compared to Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct's score of 7.2.
Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct has a 65,536 token context window, while GLM-5 Turbo has a 202,752 token context window.