Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Xiaomi

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct vs MiMo v2 Pro

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls

MiMo v2 Pro wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Pro
Context Window
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Speed
MiMo v2 Pro

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructMiMo v2 Pro
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructMiMo v2 Pro
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorQwenXiaomi
ReleasedSep 2025Unknown

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

MiMo v2 Pro Modalities

Input
Output

Related Comparisons

Compare Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct with:

Compare MiMo v2 Pro with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.20/M tokens. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.88/M tokens.
MiMo v2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.4, compared to Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct's score of 16.5.
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct has a 262,144 token context window, while MiMo v2 Pro has a unknown token context window.
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct supports vision. MiMo v2 Pro does not support vision.