Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs Qwen3.5-27B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking wins:

  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen3.5-27B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Qwen3.5-27B
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5-27B
Context Window
Qwen3.5-27B
Speed
Qwen3.5-27B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3 VL 235B A22B ThinkingQwen3.5-27B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3 VL 235B A22B ThinkingQwen3.5-27B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorQwenQwen
ReleasedSep 2025Feb 2026

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Qwen3.5-27B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking with:

Compare Qwen3.5-27B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3.5-27B has cheaper input pricing at $0.20/M tokens. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
Qwen3.5-27B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 33.4, compared to Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking's score of N/A.
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking has a 131,072 token context window, while Qwen3.5-27B has a 262,144 token context window.
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking supports vision. Qwen3.5-27B supports vision.