Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Xiaomi

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct vs MiMo-V2-Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Best Coding Model Leaderboard Find the top LLM for coding by benchmarks and community votes

114 out of our 298 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct wins:

  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls

MiMo-V2-Flash wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
MiMo-V2-Flash
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo-V2-Flash
Context Window
MiMo-V2-Flash
Speed
MiMo-V2-Flash

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricQwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructMiMo-V2-FlashWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.13$0.09 MiMo-V2-Flash
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.52$0.29 MiMo-V2-Flash
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$45000.00 MiMo-V2-Flash
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, MiMo-V2-Flash is 38% cheaper overall.

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct Providers

Alibaba $0.13 (Cheapest)
DeepInfra $0.15
Phala $0.20
Novita $0.20
SiliconFlow $0.29

MiMo-V2-Flash Providers

Chutes $0.09 (Cheapest)
AtlasCloud $0.10
Xiaomi $0.10
Novita $0.10

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
4
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct Wins
2
MiMo-V2-Flash Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkQwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructMiMo-V2-FlashWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
16.030.6
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
14.325.8
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
72.367.7
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
76.474.4
GPQA
Graduate-level science
69.565.6
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
47.640.2
MiMo-V2-Flash significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
131,072
tokens
Max output: 32,768 tokens
MiMo-V2-Flash
262,144
tokens
Max output: 65,536 tokens
MiMo-V2-Flash has a 50% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricQwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructMiMo-V2-FlashWinner
Tokens/second105.4 tok/s142.3 tok/s
Time to First Token0.92s1.18s
MiMo-V2-Flash responds 35% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructMiMo-V2-Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructMiMo-V2-Flash
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorQwenXiaomi
ReleasedOct 2025Dec 2025

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

MiMo-V2-Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct with:

Compare MiMo-V2-Flash with:

Frequently Asked Questions

MiMo-V2-Flash has cheaper input pricing at $0.09/M tokens. MiMo-V2-Flash has cheaper output pricing at $0.29/M tokens.
MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 25.8, compared to Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct's score of 14.3.
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct has a 131,072 token context window, while MiMo-V2-Flash has a 262,144 token context window.
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct supports vision. MiMo-V2-Flash does not support vision.