Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Xai
Xai

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct vs Grok 4

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time

Grok 4 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Grok 4
Context Window
Grok 4
Speed
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3 VL 32B InstructGrok 4
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3 VL 32B InstructGrok 4
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorQwenXai
ReleasedOct 2025Jul 2025

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Grok 4 Modalities

Input
imagetext
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.42/M tokens.
Grok 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 40.5, compared to Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct's score of 15.6.
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct has a 131,072 token context window, while Grok 4 has a 256,000 token context window.
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct supports vision. Grok 4 supports vision.