Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Xai
Xai

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct vs Grok 4

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

100 out of our 304 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time

Grok 4 wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Grok 4
Context Window
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
Speed
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricQwen3 VL 32B InstructGrok 4Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.50$3.00 Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
Output (per 1M tokens)$1.50$15.00 Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$750000.00 Grok 4
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is 88% cheaper overall.

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct Providers

Together $0.50 (Cheapest)

Grok 4 Providers

Vercel $3.00 (Cheapest)
xAI $3.00 (Cheapest)

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
0
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct Wins
6
Grok 4 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkQwen3 VL 32B InstructGrok 4Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
17.241.4
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
15.640.5
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
68.392.7
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
79.186.6
GPQA
Graduate-level science
67.187.7
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
51.481.9
Aider
Real-world code editing
-79.6-
AIME
Competition math
-94.3-
Grok 4 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
262,144
tokens
Grok 4
256,000
tokens
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct has a 2% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricQwen3 VL 32B InstructGrok 4Winner
Tokens/second78.2 tok/s33.9 tok/s
Time to First Token1.07s8.24s
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct responds 131% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3 VL 32B InstructGrok 4
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3 VL 32B InstructGrok 4
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorQwenXai
ReleasedOct 2025Jul 2025

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Grok 4 Modalities

Input
imagetext
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct with:

Compare Grok 4 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.50/M tokens. Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $1.50/M tokens.
Grok 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 40.5, compared to Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct's score of 15.6.
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct has a 262,144 token context window, while Grok 4 has a 256,000 token context window.
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct supports vision. Grok 4 supports vision.