Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Xiaomi

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct vs MiMo-V2-Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Sponsor Price Per Token Reach 5000+ developers comparing LLM APIs

125 out of our 298 tracked models have had a price change in January.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls

MiMo-V2-Flash wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo-V2-Flash
Context Window
MiMo-V2-Flash
Speed
Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricQwen3 VL 8B InstructMiMo-V2-FlashWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.08$0.09 Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.50$0.29 MiMo-V2-Flash
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, MiMo-V2-Flash is 24% cheaper overall.

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct Providers

Novita $0.08 (Cheapest)
Together $0.18
Alibaba $0.18
Parasail $0.25

MiMo-V2-Flash Providers

Chutes $0.09 (Cheapest)
AtlasCloud $0.10
Novita $0.10

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
0
Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct Wins
6
MiMo-V2-Flash Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkQwen3 VL 8B InstructMiMo-V2-FlashWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
14.730.4
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
7.325.8
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
27.367.7
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
68.674.4
GPQA
Graduate-level science
42.765.6
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
33.240.2
MiMo-V2-Flash significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
131,072
tokens
Max output: 32,768 tokens
MiMo-V2-Flash
262,144
tokens
MiMo-V2-Flash has a 50% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricQwen3 VL 8B InstructMiMo-V2-FlashWinner
Tokens/second97.7 tok/s94.1 tok/s
Time to First Token0.90s2.69s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3 VL 8B InstructMiMo-V2-Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3 VL 8B InstructMiMo-V2-Flash
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorQwenXiaomi
ReleasedOct 2025Dec 2025

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct Modalities

Input
imagetext
Output
text

MiMo-V2-Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct with:

Compare MiMo-V2-Flash with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.08/M tokens. MiMo-V2-Flash has cheaper output pricing at $0.29/M tokens.
MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 25.8, compared to Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct's score of 7.3.
Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct has a 131,072 token context window, while MiMo-V2-Flash has a 262,144 token context window.
Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct supports vision. MiMo-V2-Flash does not support vision.