Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Z-ai

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct vs GLM 4.5 Air

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Supports vision

GLM 4.5 Air wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
GLM 4.5 Air
Context Window
GLM 4.5 Air
Speed
Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3 VL 8B InstructGLM 4.5 Air
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3 VL 8B InstructGLM 4.5 Air
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorQwenZ-ai
ReleasedOct 2025Jul 2025

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct Modalities

Input
imagetext
Output
text

GLM 4.5 Air Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.08/M tokens. Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.20/M tokens.
GLM 4.5 Air scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 23.8, compared to Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct's score of 7.3.
Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct has a 131,072 token context window, while GLM 4.5 Air has a 131,072 token context window.
Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct supports vision. GLM 4.5 Air does not support vision.