Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Z-ai

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct vs GLM-4.7-Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math

GLM-4.7-Flash wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
GLM-4.7-Flash
Context Window
GLM-4.7-Flash
Speed
Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3 VL 8B InstructGLM-4.7-Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3 VL 8B InstructGLM-4.7-Flash
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorQwenZ-ai
ReleasedOct 2025Jan 2026

Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct Modalities

Input
imagetext
Output
text

GLM-4.7-Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

GLM-4.7-Flash has cheaper input pricing at $0.06/M tokens. Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.20/M tokens.
GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 11.0, compared to Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct's score of 7.3.
Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct has a 131,072 token context window, while GLM-4.7-Flash has a 202,752 token context window.
Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct supports vision. GLM-4.7-Flash supports vision.