Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Xiaomi

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking vs MiMo-V2-Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Best Coding Model Leaderboard Find the top LLM for coding by benchmarks and community votes

114 out of our 298 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking wins:

  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls

MiMo-V2-Flash wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
MiMo-V2-Flash
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo-V2-Flash
Context Window
MiMo-V2-Flash
Speed
MiMo-V2-Flash

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricQwen3 VL 8B ThinkingMiMo-V2-FlashWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.12$0.09 MiMo-V2-Flash
Output (per 1M tokens)$1.36$0.29 MiMo-V2-Flash
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$45000.00 MiMo-V2-Flash
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, MiMo-V2-Flash is 67% cheaper overall.

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking Providers

Alibaba $0.12 (Cheapest)

MiMo-V2-Flash Providers

Chutes $0.09 (Cheapest)
AtlasCloud $0.10
Xiaomi $0.10
Novita $0.10

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
0
Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking Wins
0
MiMo-V2-Flash Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkQwen3 VL 8B ThinkingMiMo-V2-FlashWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
-30.6-
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-25.8-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-67.7-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
-74.4-
GPQA
Graduate-level science
-65.6-
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-40.2-
MiMo-V2-Flash significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking
131,072
tokens
Max output: 32,768 tokens
MiMo-V2-Flash
262,144
tokens
Max output: 65,536 tokens
MiMo-V2-Flash has a 50% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricQwen3 VL 8B ThinkingMiMo-V2-FlashWinner
Tokens/secondN/A146.4 tok/s
Time to First TokenN/A1.23s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3 VL 8B ThinkingMiMo-V2-Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3 VL 8B ThinkingMiMo-V2-Flash
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorQwenXiaomi
ReleasedOct 2025Dec 2025

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking Modalities

Input
imagetext
Output
text

MiMo-V2-Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking with:

Compare MiMo-V2-Flash with:

Frequently Asked Questions

MiMo-V2-Flash has cheaper input pricing at $0.09/M tokens. MiMo-V2-Flash has cheaper output pricing at $0.29/M tokens.
MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 25.8, compared to Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking's score of N/A.
Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking has a 131,072 token context window, while MiMo-V2-Flash has a 262,144 token context window.
Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking supports vision. MiMo-V2-Flash does not support vision.