Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Qwen3.5 0.8B vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Qwen3.5 0.8B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

Qwen3.5 397B A17B wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Qwen3.5 0.8B
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Context Window
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Speed
Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3.5 0.8BQwen3.5 397B A17B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3.5 0.8BQwen3.5 397B A17B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorQwenQwen
ReleasedUnknownFeb 2026

Qwen3.5 0.8B Modalities

Input
Output

Qwen3.5 397B A17B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Qwen3.5 0.8B with:

Compare Qwen3.5 397B A17B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3.5 0.8B has cheaper input pricing at $0.01/M tokens. Qwen3.5 0.8B has cheaper output pricing at $0.05/M tokens.
Qwen3.5 397B A17B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.4, compared to Qwen3.5 0.8B's score of 1.0.
Qwen3.5 0.8B has a unknown token context window, while Qwen3.5 397B A17B has a 262,144 token context window.
Qwen3.5 0.8B does not support vision. Qwen3.5 397B A17B supports vision.