Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Qwen3.5-27B vs Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning)

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Qwen3.5-27B wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls

Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning) wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning)
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5-27B
Context Window
Qwen3.5-27B
Speed
Qwen3.5-27B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3.5-27BQwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning)
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3.5-27BQwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning)
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorQwenQwen
ReleasedFeb 2026Unknown

Qwen3.5-27B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning) Modalities

Input
Output

Related Comparisons

Compare Qwen3.5-27B with:

Compare Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning) with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning) has cheaper input pricing at $0.02/M tokens. Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning) has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
Qwen3.5-27B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 33.4, compared to Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning)'s score of 4.9.
Qwen3.5-27B has a 262,144 token context window, while Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning) has a unknown token context window.
Qwen3.5-27B supports vision. Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning) does not support vision.