Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Qwen3.5-27B vs Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Qwen3.5-27B wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Faster response time
Price Advantage
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5-27B
Context Window
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
Speed
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3.5-27BQwen3.5-35B-A3B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3.5-27BQwen3.5-35B-A3B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorQwenQwen
ReleasedFeb 2026Feb 2026

Qwen3.5-27B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B has cheaper input pricing at $0.15/M tokens. Qwen3.5-27B has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
Qwen3.5-27B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 33.4, compared to Qwen3.5-35B-A3B's score of 16.8.
Qwen3.5-27B has a 262,144 token context window, while Qwen3.5-35B-A3B has a 262,144 token context window.
Qwen3.5-27B supports vision. Qwen3.5-35B-A3B supports vision.