Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Qwen3.5-27B vs QwQ 32B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Qwen3.5-27B wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision

QwQ 32B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
QwQ 32B
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5-27B
Context Window
Qwen3.5-27B
Speed
Qwen3.5-27B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3.5-27BQwQ 32B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3.5-27BQwQ 32B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorQwenQwen
ReleasedFeb 2026Mar 2025

Qwen3.5-27B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

QwQ 32B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Qwen3.5-27B with:

Compare QwQ 32B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

QwQ 32B has cheaper input pricing at $0.15/M tokens. QwQ 32B has cheaper output pricing at $0.58/M tokens.
Qwen3.5-27B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 33.4, compared to QwQ 32B's score of N/A.
Qwen3.5-27B has a 262,144 token context window, while QwQ 32B has a 32,768 token context window.
Qwen3.5-27B supports vision. QwQ 32B does not support vision.