Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Xiaomi

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B vs MiMo v2 Pro

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls

MiMo v2 Pro wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Pro
Context Window
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
Speed
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3.5-35B-A3BMiMo v2 Pro
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3.5-35B-A3BMiMo v2 Pro
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorQwenXiaomi
ReleasedFeb 2026Unknown

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

MiMo v2 Pro Modalities

Input
Output

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B has cheaper input pricing at $0.16/M tokens. Qwen3.5-35B-A3B has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
MiMo v2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.4, compared to Qwen3.5-35B-A3B's score of 16.8.