Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs QwQ 32B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Qwen3.5 397B A17B wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision

QwQ 32B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
QwQ 32B
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Context Window
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Speed
Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3.5 397B A17BQwQ 32B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3.5 397B A17BQwQ 32B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorQwenQwen
ReleasedFeb 2026Mar 2025

Qwen3.5 397B A17B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

QwQ 32B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Qwen3.5 397B A17B with:

Compare QwQ 32B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

QwQ 32B has cheaper input pricing at $0.15/M tokens. QwQ 32B has cheaper output pricing at $0.58/M tokens.
Qwen3.5 397B A17B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.4, compared to QwQ 32B's score of N/A.
Qwen3.5 397B A17B has a 262,144 token context window, while QwQ 32B has a 32,768 token context window.
Qwen3.5 397B A17B supports vision. QwQ 32B does not support vision.