Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Xiaomi

Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs MiMo v2 Omni

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Qwen3.5 397B A17B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding

MiMo v2 Omni wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Context Window
MiMo v2 Omni
Speed
Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3.5 397B A17BMiMo v2 Omni
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3.5 397B A17BMiMo v2 Omni
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorQwenXiaomi
ReleasedFeb 2026Mar 2026

Qwen3.5 397B A17B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

MiMo v2 Omni Modalities

Input
textaudioimagevideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3.5 397B A17B has cheaper input pricing at $0.39/M tokens. Qwen3.5 397B A17B has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
Qwen3.5 397B A17B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.4, compared to MiMo v2 Omni's score of 35.5.
Qwen3.5 397B A17B has a 262,144 token context window, while MiMo v2 Omni has a 262,144 token context window.
Qwen3.5 397B A17B supports vision. MiMo v2 Omni supports vision.