Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Z-ai

Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs GLM 4 32B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Qwen3.5 397B A17B wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision

GLM 4 32B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
GLM 4 32B
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Context Window
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Speed
Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3.5 397B A17BGLM 4 32B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3.5 397B A17BGLM 4 32B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorQwenZ-ai
ReleasedFeb 2026Jul 2025

Qwen3.5 397B A17B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

GLM 4 32B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

GLM 4 32B has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. GLM 4 32B has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
Qwen3.5 397B A17B has a 262,144 token context window, while GLM 4 32B has a 128,000 token context window.
Qwen3.5 397B A17B supports vision. GLM 4 32B does not support vision.