Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Z-ai

Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs GLM 4.7

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Qwen3.5 397B A17B wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision

GLM 4.7 wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Context Window
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Speed
GLM 4.7

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3.5 397B A17BGLM 4.7
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3.5 397B A17BGLM 4.7
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorQwenZ-ai
ReleasedFeb 2026Dec 2025

Qwen3.5 397B A17B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

GLM 4.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3.5 397B A17B has cheaper input pricing at $0.39/M tokens. Qwen3.5 397B A17B has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
Qwen3.5 397B A17B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.4, compared to GLM 4.7's score of 32.0.
Qwen3.5 397B A17B has a 262,144 token context window, while GLM 4.7 has a 202,752 token context window.
Qwen3.5 397B A17B supports vision. GLM 4.7 does not support vision.