Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Z-ai

Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs GLM-5 Turbo

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Qwen3.5 397B A17B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision

GLM-5 Turbo wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Context Window
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Speed
Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3.5 397B A17BGLM-5 Turbo
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3.5 397B A17BGLM-5 Turbo
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorQwenZ-ai
ReleasedFeb 2026Mar 2026

Qwen3.5 397B A17B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

GLM-5 Turbo Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3.5 397B A17B has cheaper input pricing at $0.39/M tokens. Qwen3.5 397B A17B has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
Qwen3.5 397B A17B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.4, compared to GLM-5 Turbo's score of 36.8.
Qwen3.5 397B A17B has a 262,144 token context window, while GLM-5 Turbo has a 202,752 token context window.