Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Sao10k

Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning) vs Llama 3 8B Lunaris

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning) wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding

Llama 3 8B Lunaris wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning)
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning)
Context Window
Llama 3 8B Lunaris
Speed
Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning)

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning)Llama 3 8B Lunaris
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning)Llama 3 8B Lunaris
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorQwenSao10k
ReleasedUnknownAug 2024

Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning) Modalities

Input
Output

Llama 3 8B Lunaris Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning) with:

Compare Llama 3 8B Lunaris with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning) has cheaper input pricing at $0.03/M tokens. Llama 3 8B Lunaris has cheaper output pricing at $0.05/M tokens.
Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning) scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 13.7, compared to Llama 3 8B Lunaris's score of N/A.
Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning) has a unknown token context window, while Llama 3 8B Lunaris has a 8,192 token context window.
Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning) does not support vision. Llama 3 8B Lunaris does not support vision.