Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Z-ai

Qwen3.5-Flash vs GLM-4.7-Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Qwen3.5-Flash wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window

GLM-4.7-Flash wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Qwen3.5-Flash
Benchmark Advantage
GLM-4.7-Flash
Context Window
Qwen3.5-Flash
Speed
GLM-4.7-Flash

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen3.5-FlashGLM-4.7-Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen3.5-FlashGLM-4.7-Flash
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorQwenZ-ai
ReleasedFeb 2026Jan 2026

Qwen3.5-Flash Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

GLM-4.7-Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

GLM-4.7-Flash has cheaper input pricing at $0.06/M tokens. Qwen3.5-Flash has cheaper output pricing at $0.26/M tokens.
Qwen3.5-Flash has a 1,000,000 token context window, while GLM-4.7-Flash has a 202,752 token context window.
Qwen3.5-Flash supports vision. GLM-4.7-Flash supports vision.