Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Sao10k
vs
?

Llama 3 8B Lunaris vs GLM 4.1V 9B Thinking

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Llama 3 8B Lunaris wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark

GLM 4.1V 9B Thinking wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Llama 3 8B Lunaris
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3 8B Lunaris
Context Window
GLM 4.1V 9B Thinking
Speed
N/A

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3 8B LunarisGLM 4.1V 9B Thinking
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3 8B LunarisGLM 4.1V 9B Thinking
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorSao10k
ReleasedAug 2024Unknown

Llama 3 8B Lunaris Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GLM 4.1V 9B Thinking Modalities

Input
Output

Frequently Asked Questions

GLM 4.1V 9B Thinking has cheaper input pricing at $0.03/M tokens. Llama 3 8B Lunaris has cheaper output pricing at $0.05/M tokens.
Llama 3 8B Lunaris has a 8,192 token context window, while GLM 4.1V 9B Thinking has a 32,768 token context window.
Llama 3 8B Lunaris does not support vision. GLM 4.1V 9B Thinking supports vision.