Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Z-ai
vs
Z-ai

GLM-5 FP4 vs GLM-5 Turbo

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

GLM-5 FP4 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

GLM-5 Turbo wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
GLM-5 FP4
Benchmark Advantage
GLM-5 Turbo
Context Window
GLM-5 Turbo
Speed
GLM-5 Turbo

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGLM-5 FP4GLM-5 Turbo
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGLM-5 FP4GLM-5 Turbo
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorZ-aiZ-ai
ReleasedUnknownMar 2026

GLM-5 FP4 Modalities

Input
Output

GLM-5 Turbo Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare GLM-5 FP4 with:

Compare GLM-5 Turbo with:

Frequently Asked Questions

GLM-5 FP4 has cheaper input pricing at $0.00/M tokens. GLM-5 FP4 has cheaper output pricing at $0.00/M tokens.
GLM-5 Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 36.8, compared to GLM-5 FP4's score of N/A.
GLM-5 FP4 has a unknown token context window, while GLM-5 Turbo has a 202,752 token context window.
GLM-5 FP4 does not support vision. GLM-5 Turbo does not support vision.