Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Allenai
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Olmo 2 32B Instruct vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Olmo 2 32B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Olmo 2 32B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Context Window
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Speed
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureOlmo 2 32B InstructQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyOlmo 2 32B InstructQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorAllenaiQwen
ReleasedMar 2025Jul 2025

Olmo 2 32B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Olmo 2 32B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.05/M tokens. Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 22.1, compared to Olmo 2 32B Instruct's score of 2.7.
Olmo 2 32B Instruct has a 128,000 token context window, while Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 has a 262,144 token context window.
Olmo 2 32B Instruct does not support vision. Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 does not support vision.