Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs o1

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Claude 3.5 Sonnet wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at coding

o1 wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Benchmark Advantage
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Context Window
o1
Speed
o1

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude 3.5 Sonneto1
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude 3.5 Sonneto1
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorAnthropicOpenAI
ReleasedOct 2024Dec 2024

Claude 3.5 Sonnet Modalities

Input
textimagefile
Output
text

o1 Modalities

Input
textimagefile
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Claude 3.5 Sonnet has cheaper input pricing at $3.00/M tokens. Claude 3.5 Sonnet has cheaper output pricing at $15.00/M tokens.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 30.2, compared to o1's score of 20.5.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet has a 200,000 token context window, while o1 has a 200,000 token context window.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports vision. o1 supports vision.