Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Google
Google

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Claude Opus 4.6 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Has reasoning mode

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Opus 4.6
Context Window
Claude Opus 4.6
Speed
Claude Opus 4.6

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4.6Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Opus 4.6Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorAnthropicGoogle
ReleasedFeb 2026Oct 2025

Claude Opus 4.6 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) Modalities

Input
imagetext
Output
imagetext

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) has cheaper output pricing at $2.50/M tokens.
Claude Opus 4.6 has a 1,000,000 token context window, while Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) has a 32,768 token context window.
Claude Opus 4.6 supports vision. Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) supports vision.