Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Google
Google

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Image Preview (Nano Banana)

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Claude Opus 4.6 wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Has reasoning mode

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image Preview (Nano Banana) wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
Price Advantage
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image Preview (Nano Banana)
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Opus 4.6
Context Window
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image Preview (Nano Banana)
Speed
Claude Opus 4.6

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4.6Gemini 2.5 Flash Image Preview (Nano Banana)
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Opus 4.6Gemini 2.5 Flash Image Preview (Nano Banana)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorAnthropicGoogle
ReleasedFeb 2026Unknown

Claude Opus 4.6 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image Preview (Nano Banana) Modalities

Input
textimageaudiovideo
Output
textimage

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image Preview (Nano Banana) has cheaper input pricing at $0.00/M tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash Image Preview (Nano Banana) has cheaper output pricing at $0.00/M tokens.
Claude Opus 4.6 has a 1,000,000 token context window, while Gemini 2.5 Flash Image Preview (Nano Banana) has a 1,048,576 token context window.
Claude Opus 4.6 supports vision. Gemini 2.5 Flash Image Preview (Nano Banana) supports vision.