Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Minimax
Minimax

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image Preview (Nano Banana) vs MiniMax M2.7

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image Preview (Nano Banana) wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Supports vision

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image Preview (Nano Banana)
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image Preview (Nano Banana)
Speed
MiniMax M2.7

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 2.5 Flash Image Preview (Nano Banana)MiniMax M2.7
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 2.5 Flash Image Preview (Nano Banana)MiniMax M2.7
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorGoogleMinimax
ReleasedUnknownMar 2026

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image Preview (Nano Banana) Modalities

Input
textimageaudiovideo
Output
textimage

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image Preview (Nano Banana) has cheaper input pricing at $0.00/M tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash Image Preview (Nano Banana) has cheaper output pricing at $0.00/M tokens.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image Preview (Nano Banana) has a 1,048,576 token context window, while MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window.