Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Qwen3 Max Thinking

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Claude Opus 4.6 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision

Qwen3 Max Thinking wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Qwen3 Max Thinking
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Opus 4.6
Context Window
Claude Opus 4.6
Speed
Claude Opus 4.6

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4.6Qwen3 Max Thinking
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Opus 4.6Qwen3 Max Thinking
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorAnthropicQwen
ReleasedFeb 2026Feb 2026

Claude Opus 4.6 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Qwen3 Max Thinking Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 Max Thinking has cheaper input pricing at $0.78/M tokens. Qwen3 Max Thinking has cheaper output pricing at $3.90/M tokens.
Claude Opus 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 47.6, compared to Qwen3 Max Thinking's score of 24.5.
Claude Opus 4.6 has a 1,000,000 token context window, while Qwen3 Max Thinking has a 262,144 token context window.
Claude Opus 4.6 supports vision. Qwen3 Max Thinking does not support vision.