Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Claude Sonnet 4 vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

92 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Claude Sonnet 4 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Sonnet 4
Context Window
Claude Sonnet 4
Speed
Claude Sonnet 4

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricClaude Sonnet 4Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$3.00$0.22 Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Output (per 1M tokens)$15.00$1.00 Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.30$0.02 Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Cache Write (per 1M)$3.75N/A Claude Sonnet 4
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) is 93% cheaper overall.

Claude Sonnet 4 Providers

Amazon Bedrock $3.00 (Cheapest)
Google $3.00 (Cheapest)
Anthropic $3.00 (Cheapest)

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) Providers

Google $0.22 (Cheapest)
SiliconFlow $0.25
Novita $0.30
Vercel $0.40
Nebius $0.40

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
4
Claude Sonnet 4 Wins
3
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
33.024.8
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
30.624.6
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
38.039.3
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
83.778.8
GPQA
Graduate-level science
68.361.8
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
44.958.5
Aider
Real-world code editing
61.3--
AIME
Competition math
40.747.7
Claude Sonnet 4 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Claude Sonnet 4
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Claude Sonnet 4
1,000,000
tokens
Max output: 64,000 tokens
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
262,144
tokens
Claude Sonnet 4 has a 74% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricClaude Sonnet 4Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)Winner
Tokens/second63.4 tok/s47.5 tok/s
Time to First Token1.17s1.64s
Claude Sonnet 4 responds 33% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Sonnet 4Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Sonnet 4Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorAnthropicQwen
ReleasedMay 2025Jul 2025

Claude Sonnet 4 Modalities

Input
imagetextfile
Output
text

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Claude Sonnet 4 with:

Compare Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) has cheaper input pricing at $0.22/M tokens. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) has cheaper output pricing at $1.00/M tokens.
Claude Sonnet 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 30.6, compared to Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)'s score of 24.6.
Claude Sonnet 4 has a 1,000,000 token context window, while Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) has a 262,144 token context window.
Claude Sonnet 4 supports vision. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) does not support vision.