Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Claude Sonnet 4 vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Claude Sonnet 4 wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Sonnet 4
Context Window
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Speed
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Sonnet 4Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Sonnet 4Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorAnthropicQwen
ReleasedMay 2025Jul 2025

Claude Sonnet 4 Modalities

Input
imagetextfile
Output
text

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) has cheaper input pricing at $0.22/M tokens. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
Claude Sonnet 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 30.6, compared to Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)'s score of 24.6.
Claude Sonnet 4 has a 200,000 token context window, while Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) has a 262,144 token context window.
Claude Sonnet 4 supports vision. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) does not support vision.