Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Claude Sonnet 4 vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Sponsor Price Per Token Reach 5000+ developers comparing LLM APIs

116 out of our 296 tracked models have had a price change in January.

Make informed model choices with updates on pricing, new releases, and tools with our weekly newsletter.

Key Takeaways

Claude Sonnet 4 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Sonnet 4
Context Window
Claude Sonnet 4
Speed
Claude Sonnet 4

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricClaude Sonnet 4Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$3.00$0.22 Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Output (per 1M tokens)$15.00$0.95 Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Cache Read (per 1M)$300000.00N/A Claude Sonnet 4
Cache Write (per 1M)$3750000.00N/A Claude Sonnet 4
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) is 93% cheaper overall.

Claude Sonnet 4 Providers

Amazon Bedrock $3.00 (Cheapest)
OpenRouter $3.00 (Cheapest)
Google $3.00 (Cheapest)
Anthropic $3.00 (Cheapest)

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) Providers

Chutes $0.22 (Cheapest)
OpenRouter $0.22 (Cheapest)
Google $0.22 (Cheapest)
SiliconFlow $0.25
DeepInfra $0.28

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
0
Claude Sonnet 4 Wins
0
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
32.7--
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
29.4--
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
38.0--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
83.7--
GPQA
Graduate-level science
68.3--
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
44.9--
Aider
Real-world code editing
61.3--
AIME
Competition math
40.7--
Claude Sonnet 4 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Claude Sonnet 4
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Claude Sonnet 4
1,000,000
tokens
Max output: 64,000 tokens
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
262,144
tokens
Max output: 262,144 tokens
Claude Sonnet 4 has a 74% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricClaude Sonnet 4Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)Winner
Tokens/second66.3 tok/sN/A
Time to First Token1.90sN/A

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Sonnet 4Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Sonnet 4Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorAnthropicQwen
ReleasedMay 2025Jul 2025

Claude Sonnet 4 Modalities

Input
imagetextfile
Output
text

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Claude Sonnet 4 with:

Compare Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) has cheaper input pricing at $0.22/M tokens. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) has cheaper output pricing at $0.95/M tokens.
Claude Sonnet 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 29.4, compared to Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)'s score of N/A.
Claude Sonnet 4 has a 1,000,000 token context window, while Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) has a 262,144 token context window.
Claude Sonnet 4 supports vision. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) does not support vision.